{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"InformatiaCluj.ro","provider_url":"https:\/\/informatiacluj.ro","author_name":"Informatiacluj.ro","author_url":"https:\/\/informatiacluj.ro\/author\/cristian\/","title":"Curtea Suprem\u0103 a SUA d\u0103 dreptate gigan\u0163ilor din tehnologie, \u00een defavoarea victimelor atacurilor teroriste - InformatiaCluj.ro","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"

Curtea Suprem\u0103 a SUA d\u0103 dreptate gigan\u0163ilor din tehnologie, \u00een defavoarea victimelor atacurilor teroriste<\/a><\/blockquote><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/informatiacluj.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/informatia_cluj_default-1.jpg","thumbnail_width":1920,"thumbnail_height":1080,"description":"Instan\u0163a suprem\u0103 din SUA le ofer\u0103 astfel gigan\u0163ilor din domeniul tehnologiei o victorie major\u0103, f\u0103r\u0103 a intra \u00eens\u0103 \u00een dezbaterea mai ampl\u0103 referitoare la legea care \u00eei protejeaz\u0103 de un sfert de secol de urm\u0103rirea penal\u0103 pentru con\u0163inutul pe care postat online. Concret, Curtea s-a pronun\u0163at \u00een dou\u0103 cauze distincte. \u00cen primul caz, p\u0103rin\u0163ii unei tinere americane ucise \u00een atentatele din noiembrie 2015 de la Paris au depus o pl\u00e2ngere \u00eempotriva Google, compania-mam\u0103 a Youtube, pe care o acuz\u0103 c\u0103 a sprijinit consolidarea organiza\u0163iei teroriste Stat Islamic prin faptul c\u0103 a sugerat videoclipurile sale anumitor utilizatori. \u00cen al doilea caz, rudele unei victime a unui atac comis la 1 ianuarie 2017 \u00eentr-un club de noapte din Istanbul au sus\u0163inut c\u0103 Facebook, Twitter \u015fi Google ar putea fi considerate \"complice\" la atac, \u00eentruc\u00e2t eforturile lor de a elimina con\u0163inutul postat de Stat Islmic nu au fost suficient de \"energice\". \"Faptul c\u0103 actorii r\u0103i profit\u0103 de aceste platforme nu este suficient pentru a garanta c\u0103 inculpa\u0163ii au acordat \u00een mod con\u015ftient o asisten\u0163\u0103 substan\u0163ial\u0103 \u015fi au ajutat astfel aceste grup\u0103ri\", a motivat judec\u0103torul Clarence Thomas \u00een decizia unanim\u0103 a instan\u0163ei. \"Concluzion\u0103m c\u0103 acuza\u0163iile reclaman\u0163ilor sunt insuficiente pentru a stabili c\u0103 inculpa\u0163ii au ajutat \u015fi au instigat Stat Islamic s\u0103 \u00ee\u015fi desf\u0103\u015foare atacul\", a ar\u0103tat el. Judec\u00e2nd c\u0103 are suficiente argumente, f\u0103r\u0103 a fi nevoie s\u0103 mai intre \u00een dezbaterea \"Sec\u0163iunii 230\", Curtea Suprem\u0103 a \"refuzat\" s\u0103 examineze aceast\u0103 lege din 1996, considerat\u0103 un pilon al prolifer\u0103rii internetului. Textul decreteaz\u0103 c\u0103 societ\u0103\u0163ile de tehnologie nu pot fi considerate \"editori\" \u015fi se pot bucura de imunitate judiciar\u0103 \u00een cazul con\u0163inuturilor postate pe platformele lor."}